Close
Portfolio careers are increasingly important in a disruptive labour market.
Image by Markus Winkler from Pixabay

The Portfolio Career I Didn’t Know I Was Building

The world feels more uncertain than it was before. Yet I’ve never felt more sure about the kind of career I want. 

That’s not to say I know exactly what role I’ll land in five years or which skills I’ll need to master next. Job titles and roles matter—they help you understand required capabilities and map stepping stones forward. I’ve used this approach many times, and it’s served me well.

But I’m entering a new phase of career thinking. Rather than chase the next job with its narrow definitions and built-in limitations, I want to cultivate my own unique suite of skills and expertise that leads to interesting, challenging opportunities.

Enter the portfolio career.

The Era of Portfolio Careers Has Arrived

We’ve long thought of careers as ladders to climb—promotions, better pay, prestigious titles. That paradigm is all but outdated.

The OECD confirms what many already know: 21st-century career paths have become increasingly fluid. Workers change jobs, employers, and entire careers more frequently than past generations. Average job tenure has declined across OECD countries. U.S. data shows baby boomers held nearly 13 jobs over their working lives, with surveys suggesting half of all workers undergo a complete career change during their lifetime.

“The successful career of the future is not a ladder to climb. It’s a portfolio to curate.” — April Rinne, futurist

Rapid technological change and labour market disruption mean we must adapt continuously, develop new skills, and sometimes change careers entirely. Unlike a job that can be lost, your portfolio career—the collection of skills, experiences, and capabilities you’ve built—is yours forever.

Portfolio careers are especially relevant for international professionals who have crossed borders, rebuilt careers in new countries, learnt whole new cultures, and navigated challenges of visas, identity, and belonging.

This isn’t a trendy concept. It describes what we’ve been doing all along—whether for advancement or survival—even when we didn’t have language to name it.

So how can we better appreciate our own portfolio careers?

Taking inspiration from Agile methodology, I suggest doing a career retrospective: a structured reflection on your journey to date, examining all your roles (paid and unpaid, including volunteering), and discovering themes and threads.

My Career Retrospective: 25 Roles in 25 Years

When I list everything I’ve done from my first gig out of high school to now, I count 25+ roles spanning 25+ years.

My laundry list includes: piano teacher, lifestyle writer, dance company manager, English teacher, conflict management trainer, business communications lecturer, researcher, student association president, business development manager, principal advisor to a deputy secretary, social media manager, board member, worship leader, and university career consultant.

One could call it chaotic. To a recruiter, it might seem like a bewildering collection of disparate roles, leaving them wondering what kind of career chameleon they’re dealing with.

But how about poetic? From a young age, I’ve been driven by curiosity and purpose, following personal interests rather than conventional pathways. Each role represents a desire to pursue passion, help people, or contribute to something bigger than myself.

Photo by Ian Schneider on Unsplash

The Early Years: Passion vs. Pragmatism

The coolest role I had at university was arts and film reviewer for an e-zine set up by enterprising students starting their web hosting business. The gig didn’t pay, but spending evenings watching theatre, dance productions, and countless films for free was payment enough. Critiquing performances and narratives was the highest form of self-actualisation for an arts student majoring in English.

After graduation, I worked in the dot-com sector as it was about to bubble-burst, moved to arts management, then teaching. I constantly felt tension between passion and pragmatism in my home country of Singapore. My peers were well ahead in their established careers while I worried about my CV, which screamed “job-hopper” from day one.

The Settling Down Phase: Getting “Real”

When I was ready to settle down and start a family, I was determined to hang up my footloose approach and get serious about a “real job.” I interviewed for a conflict management trainer role that felt very much in my element. I was video recorded doing a mock training session which felt natural, thanks to past teaching gigs and high school drama productions.

Then came the chat with the big boss. She was concerned about my CV: “Can you actually stay in this job?” I played my adulting card—all truth, no fluff. She later told me: “If it wasn’t for your video, we wouldn’t have given your CV a second look.”

Life stage and family responsibilities changed everything. I was looking for stability and professional growth, which I found in training and education roles. I spent 10 years sharpening my trainer’s toolkit, honing my teaching craft, delving into pedagogies, and completing my Master of Arts in Teaching. There was great satisfaction doing meaningful work through my skills and talents, yet a restlessness tugged at my sensibilities.

The Big Leap: PhD and Migration

That restlessness led to another life-changing transition. Inspired by theories and research I’d spent long hours writing about for my Master’s, I wanted to go further. I decided I wanted to do a PhD in Education with dreams of becoming an academic. I also wanted my family to experience something new, for my children to enjoy their childhood, and to take this calculated risk before we got too comfortable.

We moved to New Zealand where I started a new role as a PhD candidate and threw myself wholeheartedly into academia and research.

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Making Sense of the Pattern

How could I make sense of all these roles?

Analysing them using Holland Codes (RIASEC personality types) revealed this: I have a Social-Enterprising-Artistic (SEA) profile. Social is clearly dominant, Enterprising a strong secondary, and Artistic significant. Conventional and Investigative are moderate, while Realistic is non-existent.

Whilst people usually take the profile test to explore related jobs, this reverse analysis helped me appreciate something profound: The SEA profile isn’t just about job preferences or job fit. It reveals my desire to combine social, enterprising, and artistic elements in my work. Or put another way: to be someone who influences and develops people, spearheads projects, and offers creative and original insights.

The portfolio I built was invisible to me for years because I measured it against conventional markers of progress and prestige, even whilst trying to explore alternative directions.

Seven Years of Change, Challenge, and Completion

This realisation emerged recently whilst reflecting on my original migration plans and PhD dreams. Serendipitously, it’s been seven years since completing my PhD.

Seven years. That’s how long it took from completing my PhD in Education at the University of Waikato to finding my way back to a university setting, but in a role I never imagined when I submitted my thesis.

Seven years often represents a period of completion, transformation, and cycles. When I walked across that graduation stage, I carried dreams of an academic career: publications, teaching positions, research grants. That was the primary motivator for moving countries and uprooting my family. The academic career seemed like a natural progression from teaching in higher education, and a worthy, family-proud career I would add.

Photo by MD Duran on Unsplash

The pathway I envisioned was clear and conventional. What I got instead was seven years of non-academic roles where I swapped my academic identity for a professional one that felt strange at first but grew in skills, knowledge, and networks over time. It was difficult to admit I’d “failed” to become an academic. I used to joke that I was a “recovering academic” when I first started my professional role.

But looking at those seven years through an emotional lens, I also recall the roller coaster: rejection and reinvention, success and shattered plans. The search for academic jobs felt hopeful but grew hopeless through successive rejections. Then came a career consultant role for new migrants that was supposed to be temporary but led to pragmatic considerations of stable income. A pivot into government work took me further from my academic identity, yet the professional environment was exciting and rewarding. Just when I thought I’d made impressive strides, involuntary redundancy forced me to consider returning to Singapore, questioning whether migration itself had been a mistake.

The roller coaster graph of those seven years ends on a high with my current role as university career consultant. Climbing from rock bottom to this high point was no magic wand, quick career hack, or pure dumb luck. I was forced to consider all options, dig deep, and get uncomfortable with worst-case scenarios. The Social-Enterprising-Artistic aspects of my career personality jostled for attention. I felt drawn to roles that gave me the most energy and hope.

At any point during those seven years, if you’d asked about my career, I would have simply answered with facts, stating the job I had or that I was looking for one.

But here’s what hindsight reveals: I was building a portfolio career all along. I just couldn’t see it because it’s very hard to avoid measuring yourself against conventional markers of progress and prestige, even when you’re consciously trying to explore alternative directions.

When Your PhD Feels Like a Cruel Joke

PhD students often indulge in cruel optimism – the doctoral aspiration for academic life despite depressing realities of limited opportunities and precarious pathways. I was truly an optimist, feeling ultra-motivated to publish, attend conferences, and do everything possible to increase my academic capital and beat the odds.

My PhD research focused on peer brokering practices amongst international learners, specifically how students navigate culturally relevant connections and networks to succeed in unfamiliar academic environments. I understood, intellectually and personally, what it meant to be an outsider trying to find my way. I’d lived it as a Singaporean Chinese in New Zealand: trying to explain who I was culturally and ethnically to a largely disinterested audience, working hard and speaking out to prove naysayers wrong, always seeking connections and networks that understood my work and identity.

Cruel optimism ran its course. Urgent pragmatism loomed large in the rearview mirror.

The cruel part wasn’t just the reality of the academic job market and short-term contracts, but that being migrant, Asian, Chinese, unconventional, and assertive was a mixed bag of traits that didn’t quite fit the people, place, and perspective where I was situated.

With my PhD degree done and dusted, it was a full-time paid job that would keep my migrant dreams alive, not a half-baked notion of someday getting an academic position. Because that’s what migration demands. You can’t afford idealism when you need to prove economic value whilst still establishing your foothold in a new country.

The Invisible Portfolio I Was Actually Building

They say hindsight is 20/20. Commenting on the past seems easy when you know the outcome. But that clarity is only useful if it’s meaningful and teaches lessons for the future.

What do my aha moments tell me about myself, my career, and my future?

Phase 1: Getting a Foot in the Door (The Accidental Job)

When I took the career consultant role working with new migrants, it felt like survival mode. Ditching the academic dream for a job. A foot in the door to the public sector. Something to pay bills whilst figuring out what came next.

What it looked like then: A compromise. Moving away from academia and research. Leaving behind the identity I’d worked so hard to build.

What I can see now: This role built new knowledge structures of the public sector and provided the very foundation of my career practice today. I was developing:

  • Deep empathy through shared experience: I wasn’t just helping migrants; I was one. I understood the disorientation, the pressure to prove yourself, the exhaustion of constant cultural translation.
  • The art of brokering in practice: My research had been about peer brokering. Now I was doing it professionally by connecting people to resources, translating between cultural contexts, helping others navigate unfamiliar systems.
  • Client-centred coaching skills: Every conversation required listening beneath the surface, understanding what people weren’t saying, recognising cultural dimensions of career aspirations.
  • Knowledge of settlement systems: I was learning the landscape of migration support, policy, and barriers—knowledge that grew my systems thinking and analysis skills.

This wasn’t just a job. It was an apprenticeship in policy implementation and cross-cultural career development that no academic position could have provided.

Phase 2: Embracing a New Professional Mindset (Switching Track)

The pathway into government jobs took me even further from what I thought I wanted. Policy. Stakeholder management. Bureaucratic processes. This wasn’t education. This wasn’t research. This was a completely different professional culture.

What it looked like then: I was losing my academic identity. Becoming someone else. Forced in a different direction.

What I can see now: I was gaining dual citizenship in academic and professional cultures—an attribute I didn’t think much of before but has provided unique credibility to different audiences. I developed:

  • Policy thinking: Understanding how systems work, how decisions get made, how to navigate institutional structures
  • Stakeholder management across differences: Working with diverse groups, building consensus, translating between organisational languages
  • Public sector networks: Connections across government agencies, exposure to how settlement and education policy machinery actually operates
  • Institutional navigation skills: The patience to work within complex systems, the strategic thinking to influence them

I was learning my identity didn’t have to be either/or. I could hold both academic researcher and government professional. I could maintain my “north star” of international education whilst being pragmatic about where I worked. In fact, that north star helped me land a job at Education New Zealand as business development manager.

However, holding two identities also taught me that working in government was less about asserting personal authoritative expertise and more about implementing policies of the government of the day, regardless of opinion or perspective.

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Phase 3: Contributing to Causes and Networks (Keeping My Passion Alive)

Throughout my government years, I never stopped watching for opportunities related to my research interests: international students, migration, cross-cultural engagement, supporting ethnic communities. 

I initiated Lunar New Year celebrations at my workplace. I was an active member of the Pan-Asian Public Sector Network. I applied successfully to be a board member of English Language Partners (New Zealand’s largest provider of English language training to migrants and former refugees). I maintained connections with academic friends and professional associations, and wrote about my passion topics on my blog.

What it looked like then: Scattered focus. Trying to be someone I couldn’t really be anymore. Not knowing where passion projects were leading—maybe a dead end.

What I can see now: This was planned happenstance in action, the career theory by John Krumboltz about creating and transforming unplanned events into opportunities. I was engaging in:

  • Strategic networking: Building bridges between sectors, creating weak ties that Mark Granovetter’s research showed would be more valuable than strong ties
  • Domain expertise maintenance: Supporting and advocating for cross-cultural engagement and inclusion even whilst working in completely different areas, ensuring I could speak both languages when opportunities arose
  • Persistence without rigidity: Having direction without being so attached to specific outcomes that I missed other possibilities

I also wonder if keeping passion alive with these extracurricular activities was the extra fuel that kept me motivated in my day job, especially when work demands zapped all optimistic energy from my tank.

Career transitions aren’t just about skills and opportunities. They’re about identity, belonging, and the courage to rebuild yourself when your plans fall apart.

Phase 4: Losing My Job and Feeling Like a Loser (Hitting Rock Bottom)

When the notice of redundancy came, I felt I was free-falling. No government job. Few alternatives. A good track record and previous connections seemed to count for little when everyone else had those things too.

It felt like reliving the cruel optimism of pursuing a PhD but worse. I had overcome, I had succeeded, and now I’d fallen off what looked like the highest rung, with no substitute in sight. Was someone punishing me for thinking I could make it this far?

Urgent pragmatism reared its fat, ugly head. Should I stay or should I go? Should I return to Singapore? Had my PhD and all these years establishing my New Zealand career been for nothing?

What it looked like then: Failure. Career stagnation. The end of my New Zealand story.

What I can see now: This forced pause helped me pull together my portfolio career elements. Now both content and process are key components of my training and coaching practice. I gained:

  • Clarity about values: When considering leaving a country, you discover what actually matters. I had to articulate why I wanted to stay, what New Zealand meant to me, what kind of work would be meaningful.
  • Resilience through radical uncertainty: I learnt to sit with not knowing. To hold multiple possibilities without immediately needing resolution. To be reminded that man proposes, but God disposes, and that God ultimately directs my steps and determines my outcomes.
  • Introspection as a practice: The ability to examine my assumptions, challenge my own narratives, and ask hard questions became a skill I could offer others.
  • Normalising ‘return’ without shame: Many international professionals face this crossroads. I learnt that considering all options, including returning home, isn’t failure. Despite the social stigma of a failed migration story (common in many Asian cultures), I consider it a blessing to be able to have the option of returning home when others may not have such a choice. It’s a choice worthy of consideration that holds potential benefit.

This period taught me something important about career transition: 

It’s not just about transferrable skills and opportunities. It’s about identity, belonging, and the courage to rebuild when plans fall apart.

During this time, I took steps to explore what I’d been interested in for ages, what was part and parcel of an academic’s job, what I’d done professionally as corporate trainer and lecturer, and engaged in when mentoring junior staff and organising onboarding programmes: training and coaching.

I started looking into professional development programmes, getting credentialled for past experience and skills, volunteering my training and coaching services to not-for-profits. The more I did it, the more alive I felt. I was once again in my element!

Attaining professional membership with the Career Development Association of New Zealand was a milestone of gigantic proportions. It validated this: that my PhD in Education and previous teaching, coaching, and career development experience had not been in vain. In fact, all of it was highly valuable for the work of a careers practitioner.

Phase 5: University Career Consultant (Full Circle Integration)

After more than 20 job applications and rejections, whilst exploring and experimenting with training and coaching, a job ad caught my attention: Career Consultant, Victoria University of Wellington. This was a role I’d been practising for months, work I’d done before, in an environment I was highly attracted to. I interviewed successfully for the role, and when I started, it felt absolutely right from day one.

It wasn’t the academic role I’d once clamoured for, but I was working in an educational and intellectual environment promoting student success and supporting equity groups like international and refugee-background students. Not only was I doing meaningful work with direct impact, I genuinely felt welcomed, included, and valued for my knowledge and contributions. Turns out my PhD and all those publications and conferences had built a reputation I didn’t know existed!

What it looked like then: Finally arriving. Coming home.

What I can see now: This role was only possible because of everything that came before. I didn’t return to the university. I arrived as someone completely different.

I brought:

  • Lived experience of migration that allows me to truly understand international students
  • Government systems knowledge that helps me navigate institutional contexts
  • Cross-cultural coaching expertise developed through working in multicultural Singapore and with new migrants in New Zealand
  • Research credentials that give me credibility in an academic environment
  • Brokering skills I can now teach explicitly, drawing on both my PhD research and professional practice

The portfolio I built wasn’t the one I planned. It was more meaningful, more multifaceted, and more transferable than I could have imagined.

Hindsight is 20/20, but only if you’re willing to look back and name what you’ve built. Only if you’re willing to let go of the portfolio you planned and embrace the one you actually have.

The Portfolio Career You Have Is Often Not the One You Planned

When I look back at those seven years between PhD and university career consultant, I don’t see wasted time anymore. I see a portfolio that emerged through lived experience, adaptive responses, and willingness to learn from unexpected places.

The portfolio I built was invisible to me for years because I only saw what was important for my current job and immediate future. I thought success meant getting the job you trained for, getting promoted, getting more money.

But the career retrospective helped me see that where I am today isn’t just a result of accumulated skills, knowledge, and experience. My career personality profile of Social-Enterprising-Artistic was seeded during university, evolved over different life stages, and very much fuelled the career choices and life decisions I’ve made.

Image by Vilius Kukanauskas from Pixabay

Here’s the paradox I’ve come to understand: even as I consciously tried to chart a different course, I found myself unconsciously measuring progress against traditional markers like job titles, seniority levels, institutional prestige. It’s incredibly difficult to fully let go of these ingrained metrics, even when intellectually you know they don’t capture the full picture of career growth. The tension between exploring new directions and seeking validation through conventional markers was constant. Only in retrospect can I see that the real progress was happening in the very moments I thought I was “falling behind.”

Hindsight is 20/20, but only if you’re willing to look back and name what you’ve built. Only if you’re willing to let go of the portfolio you planned and embrace the one you actually have.

An Invitation to Be Intentional

What hidden portfolio have you been building?

Look back at your career path, especially the parts that felt like failures or detours.

  • What were you actually learning?
  • What skills were you developing that you’ve never named?
  • What connections were you making that seemed peripheral but turned out essential?

The career you have is often different from the one you planned. But different doesn’t mean lesser. It may be richer than you thought, more resilient than you realise, and truly unique and yours to own.


Dr Sherrie Lee is a career coach for cross-cultural and mid-career transitions. She helps international professionals build networks and thrive in new work cultures. Her lived experience as a migrant, research on knowledge brokering, and active professional networks give her a unique perspective on staying resilient and future-ready amid career uncertainty and disruption. Connect with her at thediasporicacademic.com

Final Destination: I’ve Found What I’m Looking For

Image by Jan Vašek from Pixabay

Seven years ago I made the most significant life decision to date – uprooting my family from Singapore and moving to New Zealand for what many would regard as ‘a better life’. I felt my family was complete with three young children, had an epiphany about doing research and preparing for an academic career in international education, and wanted to start fresh in a new place that would welcome us wholeheartedly, a place we could grow to love, a place we trusted to provide a more equitable future for our family.

Today, seven years after making that decision, I have finally found what I’ve been looking for. 2021 has become the year of the ‘final destination’ not because there’s nowhere else to go from now on, but the culmination of residency, house ownership, established relationships and meaningful employment has marked the end of a seven year journey towards being and feeling settled.

I never thought it would have taken seven years when the typical time was 24 months, at least according to well-meaning advice from the New Zealand government in the form of a settlement curve (Note: While they say it is different for everyone, there’s no other example given). But perhaps those seven years were necessary to build up resilience through struggles of varying depth and emotion, and to fully appreciate the complex feelings and mental state around migration and settlement.

The journey started on shaky ground. 

We arrived in Hamilton in late November 2014 close to the start of the summer holidays and were left wondering if we had chosen a ghost town to reside in in the first couple of months. That meant having to do a whole lot of DIY in finding familiar people and networks, much like how we had to figure out how to DIY around the house. You might consider this just an initial blip of an otherwise upward trending settlement experience (again, according to the settlement curve theory). But the experience was more like ‘peaks and troughs’ unevenly spread out, interspersed with flatline day-to-day routine living of school drop-offs and pick-ups, supermarket runs and going to church.

Peaks were often associated with feeling part of the community (whether this was school, work or church) where we could express ourselves without fear of ridicule or suspicion. These were positive outcomes of coming to New Zealand. But the most significant peak was securing sufficiently paid employment that was considered relevant for a residency application. That was the biggest deciding factor for our future in the country after I completed my PhD study. This meant moving from Hamilton to Wellington, and changing my life and career trajectory altogether.

The troughs, in contrast, can be characterised by feelings of rejection by the host country. Rather than singular events, it was the reminders of how Kiwis were largely ‘friendly but not friend making’; efforts to establish personal relationships were either misplaced or flat out unreciprocated. But then again, new friendships in my stage of life – middle-aged with three children turning into teenagers – were going to be far and few between. And so I quietly resigned myself to the temporary friendships with fellow international PhD students for several years. When I started working, navigating collegial relationships in the New Zealand workplace was another new experience to grapple with. I remember having coffee with a new team and feeling like a foreigner all over again with jokes and cultural and sports references zipping past over my head. And during times like these, I would hear the soundtrack playing the song of whether the strange would ever truly become familiar. 

Through the seven years of peaks and troughs and flatlines in between, as well as pandemic induced lockdowns and border restrictions, I have learnt how to do more of ‘living in the moment’ – a challenge for someone who thrives on order and being organised. Carpe diem – seize the day – as my 20 year old self would remind me.

I’ve also realised that the initial dream of ‘a better life’ in New Zealand has changed into something else. It has been muted by the reality of creeping housing prices and inflation, petty politics and shortsighted planning. But the desire for a more equitable future for the family is playing out in different ways and unfolding over time. The grass is always greener on the other side, and to New Zealand’s credit, the air is fresher and personal freedoms are greater on this side of the world. Particularly with greater personal freedom, I’ve experienced and achieved a number of things which would have been difficult or impossible if I had remained in Singapore.

Part of the dream of ‘a better life’ was about creating an environment where we could appreciate different worldviews and other cultures while being comfortable with ourselves and others. Today we have the permission to call New Zealand home, a house we own, a community we belong to, new and meaningful friendships, and most recently, landing a job that meets my pragmatic, professional, intellectual and aspirational needs. So in some ways, I’ve fulfilled my dream, but it’s really a dream in progress, working at embracing all of the good, and overcoming the struggles and setbacks.

P.S. The title of this blog post is a response to U2’s song. It has a catchy tune but I’m glad I’m not singing this in my head anymore.

Using your PhD in a non-academic job

… and staying true to your world-changing aspirations

Image by Raam Gottimukkala from Pixabay

It has been one year since attending my graduation ceremony at the marae grounds of the University of Waikato. It was a momentous occasion to mark the achievement of attaining a Doctor of Philosophy in Education. The preceding months of successfully defending my thesis and having my thesis bound and deposited into the library felt like a holding statement, and the graduation day was the public announcement that I had become a ‘doctor’!

Yet, I have to admit, it felt anti-climatic. The long hours of research, reading and painstaking writing did not bring me to the promised land of academic milk and honey. In fact, I had fallen out of love with the university and academia, almost like a jilted lover after years of unrequited love and adoration. 

Recently, I shared my story of how failure to secure an academic job led me to the public sector, seemingly by accident, but in hindsight, it was the right match for my interests and passion for social justice.

While I have indeed taken my PhD elsewhere, the PhD in me hasn’t disappeared completely. My academic reading habits have helped me scan wordy or lengthy documents for key ideas, and be sensitive to underlying epistemologies and critical of seemingly easy solutions. So while the PhD is not usually a pre-requisite for government jobs, or the vast majority of jobs for that matter, having the frameworks and skills of rigorous thinking has given me great tools for navigating rapidly changing landscapes. The challenge, however, is being able to do this as fast as possible to keep up with the changes!

My interest in good ideas and arguments hasn’t disappeared either. I’ve taken an interest in policy research and have been following the updates of policy think tanks such as The New Zealand Initiative and the professional organisation for public servants IPANZ to keep pace with the latest thinking in the public sector.

At some point, I would like to return to research and writing, but this time for a professional audience, and with the purpose of addressing the elephants in the room. I already have one topic in mind: The Case for Slow Thinking in Fast Places. And another: Is Multiculturalism All Things to All People? And to make a neat three: The Freedom to Act Justly and Love Mercy.

He has shown you, O mortal, what is good.
    And what does the Lord require of you?
To act justly and to love mercy
    and to walk humbly with your God.
Micah 6:8

The Power of Peer Support

Peer support for doctoral students meets emotional and cultural needs outside power relations imposed by institutional structures and authority figures.

I was recently invited to contribute a blog post to the Trust Me! blog, an amazing resource for research supervisor development, helmed by Dr Kay Guccione, Chair of the University of Sheffield Mentoring Network. My post is based on a recent article I wrote about how peer support and student advocacy are important resources for supporting international (indeed, all) doctoral students. The original post is re-produced here with kind permission from Kay Guccione.

[Journal article ref: Lee, S. (2017). Peer Support for International Doctoral Students in Managing Supervision Relationships. Journal of International Students, 7(4), 1096–1103. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1035971]

~~~~~~~~

I write from the perspective of a former postgraduate student leader (peer-mentoring others) and an international doctoral student. Based on my personal doctoral experiences, and interactions with fellow doctoral students, I share how peer support addresses supervision-related issues that are not easily met by administrative processes or supervisors themselves.

In the New Zealand context, the early period of one’s PhD candidature is ‘conditional’ and the candidate has to prepare a research proposal (or report), and a research ethics application if applicable, to be approved by the end of 6 months (extendable to 9 months). Thus, the most important milestone of a first-year PhD student was reaching ‘confirmed enrolment’. The stress of not seeming to make progress in meeting that milestone is compounded for international students who face family, societal, and/or financial pressure to succeed.

The stress of possible failure, as I have experienced for myself, comes about from supervision practices that do not provide encouragement to the developing researcher, and/or clear guidance for the documentation required for confirmation. Students who are new to the country and the institutional culture may be trying to make sense of their supervisors’ communication style and unspoken expectations. One may be trying very hard to read between the lines, while respecting the supervisors’ authority, and at the same time, wondering how far, and how best to assert one’s autonomy and epistemological perspective. Such negotiations may even continue past the confirmed enrolment stage and into the unfolding doctoral journey.

Across self-help guides and well-meaning (or maybe just mean) advice, such worries are often dismissed as ‘normal’ or somewhat needing to be better managed by the student. Rare is the response that asks supervisors to take greater responsibility in engaging with their students, especially those who are negotiating with intersecting demands of cultural ‘adaptation’, scholarly independence, and personal pressures of dealing with failure (however defined by the individual).

In my role as a postgraduate student representative at the university, I regularly engaged with international doctoral students. After I stepped down from the leadership position, I continued to mentor peers as and when the need arose. Having gone through a fairly rough first year, but coming out stronger at the end of it, provided me the insight to assist my peers in making sense of their experiences. I had also personally been on the receiving end of constructive advice from a more experienced peer. Had it not been for her regular following up on my situation, I might not have taken action to address my own well-being as a doctoral student.

In my conversations with fellow doctoral students, the issues they raised was more often than not related to the supervision relationship or supervision/communication practices. I usually respond by pointing out the various institutional structures that provide support for doctoral students. While many students had some idea of the hierarchy and reporting lines, few were prepared to use official routes of seeking redress. The suspicion of the efficacy of bureaucratic intervention was one reason; not wishing to expend additional emotional and mental energy was another; avoiding the embarrassment and shame of being exposed was also a likely reason if admitted. We would then discuss communication strategies, talk through possible outcomes, and debate on what a best case scenario would look like. Sometimes they concluded that institutional intervention was necessary. At other times, they chose to ‘wait and see’. It was also useful for us to rehearse what they wished to say to supervisors or other authority figures. Our conversations, done in private, did not promise to make things perfect. If anything, it reinforced the reality of imperfect but negotiable supervision experiences.

The doctoral journey is notorious for being isolating and emotionally draining. Institutions, especially at the faculty level, need to make concerted efforts to encourage peer interactions and peer mentorship so PhD students have opportunities to consult, debate and consider possibilities regarding supervision issues in a safe and supportive environment. As an international doctoral student, I have experienced and observed the benefits of peer support, especially when institutional structures and authority figures are not able to satisfactorily meet emotional and cultural needs.

~~~~~~~~

International Doctoral Students as Diasporic Academics

dandelion-333643_1920

I first heard the term ‘diaspora academics’ at Wendy Larner’s keynote speech at the 2016 ISANA International Education Association Conference in Wellington. Against the backdrop of the internationalisation of higher education, Larner presented an argument about the increasing importance of diasporic academics, that is, those who have multiple national affiliations. Examples of diasporic academics include researchers from one country based in another country working on a collaborative project; an academic from one country relocating to another country; as well as research students from one country carrying out research in another country, or travelling between countries for research purposes. These academics or researchers who stay on more permanently in the host country are known as diasporic academics.

Larner argued that diasporic academics are valuable in advancing universities’ internationalisation strategies and policies. They are valuable because they act as transnational knowledge brokers or academic intermediaries. They broker international relationships between countries by using “their experiential understandings, linguistic skills and ability to read cultural nuance by providing insider accounts” (Larner, 2015, p. 202).

Larner also highlighted that a significant portion of diasporic academics are former international doctoral students who subsequently established their career in the host country. While she did not elaborate on this particular group, Larner’s presentation did get me thinking about whether I, and others, consider international doctoral students as valuable diasporic academics.

The thought of international doctoral students as diasporic academics provoked both excitement and disappointment in me. As an international doctoral student myself, I was thrilled by the idea that I could be considered valuable to my host institution. But the excitement quickly gave way to the day-to-day realities. Instead of being engaged in some cross-cultural understanding between my professional and research experiences and that of the host institutional community, interactions with domestic peers and established academics and researchers were hit and miss occasions in the absence of an authentic community of practice. These nagging feelings resonated with my fellow international doctoral students, often in private or quiet conversation.

Then came along an opportunity to articulate those nagging feelings in a more coherent fashion at a conference presentation. What resulted was a well-received presentation at the 2017 NZARE (New Zealand Association for Research in Education) Conference, as well as an article based on the presentation.


In both the presentation and the article, I share my own experiences and observations of how international doctoral students do not seem to be meaningfully integrated into the larger academic community, but instead, remain within ‘international only’ circles.

Nonetheless, I remain hopeful that our value as diasporic academics can be realised through the indigenous Māori concept of mannakitanga, which means “… mutual care and respect for people, honouring one another or power sharing…” (Kukutai & Rata, 2017, p. 41). As I conclude in the article, if we truly value mannakitanga, then integrating international doctoral students into the fabric of university life would be less a burden and simply a way of doing things.

References

Kukutai, T., & Rata, A. (2017). From mainstream to Manaaki: Indigenising our approach to immigration. In D. Hall (ed.), Fair borders? Migration policy in the twenty-first century (pp. 26–45). Wellington, New Zealand: Bridget Williams Books.

Larner, W. (2015). Globalising knowledge networks: Universities, diaspora strategies, and academic intermediaries. Geoforum, 59, 197–205. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.006

 

Don`t copy text!